What are teams looking for in a Clay alternative?

Most teams want lower complexity, more transparent pricing, easier maintenance, stronger CRM integrations, native outreach features, and faster access to warm leads or intent signals.

Does Gojiberry offer GTM automation?

Yes. Gojiberry.ai combines warm lead discovery, ICP filtering, AI agents, and outreach automation for go-to-market teams that want to move faster.

Which Clay alternative is best for warm leads?

Gojiberry.ai is one of the strongest options for warm leads because it is built around identifying high-intent prospects and helping teams launch AI-assisted outreach directly from those signals.

Which Clay alternative is best for enterprise data quality?

ZoomInfo is often considered one of the strongest enterprise-grade alternatives when data coverage and scale are the main priorities.

What is waterfall enrichment?

Waterfall enrichment is a method where several data providers are queried one after another until the requested contact or company data is found, helping improve match rates and coverage.

Which Clay alternative is best for European teams?

Cognism is often preferred by European teams because of its strong positioning around GDPR-compliant B2B data.

What integrations does Gojiberry support?

Gojiberry.ai integrates with tools such as Slack, HubSpot, and Pipedrive, making it a strong fit for modern GTM and sales workflows.

Clay alternatives for data enrichment: 9 tools tested

Q: What is the best Clay alternative for data enrichment?

The best Clay alternative depends on your use case. Gojiberry.ai is a strong choice for warm lead discovery and AI-driven outreach, Apollo.io works well for all-in-one prospecting, and ZoomInfo is often used by enterprise teams focused on large-scale data quality.

Q: Is Gojiberry cheaper than Clay?

For many teams, Gojiberry.ai can be more predictable and easier to justify because it focuses on warm leads, AI agents, and outreach execution instead of requiring complex enrichment workflows across multiple tools.

Q: Can Gojiberry replace Clay?

Yes, for teams whose main goal is to find warm leads, filter by ICP, and launch outreach campaigns. Clay remains stronger for highly customized data workflows, while Gojiberry.ai is better suited to teams that want faster go-to-market execution.

Romàn

I tested 9 Clay alternatives for data enrichment – here's which ones actually work

Data enrichment and GTM automation tools have exploded in popularity over the last few years. Platforms like Clay have become incredibly powerful for building automated workflows, enriching data, and orchestrating go-to-market strategies.

But here’s the reality many teams discover after implementing Clay:

-It can be complex to set up
-Costs can scale quickly with usage
-It often requires technical knowledge to maintain workflows

Because of that, more and more GTM teams are looking for Clay alternatives for data enrichment that are easier to deploy, faster to run, or more focused on lead generation and outreach automation.

In this guide, I tested 9 Clay alternatives used by modern sales and growth teams in 2026.

You’ll learn:

-Which tools are best for data enrichment
-Which platforms handle AI-driven outreach
-Which alternatives offer better pricing or usability

And most importantly: which tool is actually worth using depending on your GTM stack.

‍

Quick quiz: find your best Clay alternative

⚡ Quiz — 60 seconds

Clay or Gojiberry?
Find your ideal outbound tool.

3 quick questions to see which Clay alternative
actually fits your real outbound needs.

Free · No signup · 60 seconds

Question 1 / 3

What matters most in your outbound motion right now?

Booking meetings with warm, intent-based leads

A plug-and-play tool I can launch without a RevOps team

Building complex multi-source enrichment workflows from scratch

Scaling a predictable pipeline without endless setup time

Question 2 / 3

What's your biggest frustration with Clay today?

The learning curve is too steep for your team

Credit costs escalate faster than expected each month

Not enough integrations or data sources for my use case

Enriched data stays cold without real buying signals attached

Question 3 / 3

Which change would make the biggest difference for your pipeline?

Reaching prospects exactly when they show buying intent

Shipping a working outbound system in days, not weeks

Even more data enrichment layers and waterfall logic

An all-in-one tool with transparent, predictable pricing

🎯

Your best match

Gojiberry is the smartest Clay alternative for your stack

Your answers show you want warm, intent-based leads and a workflow you can ship without weeks of setup or an ops engineer. Gojiberry is built exactly for that — it surfaces buying signals, so your team only reaches out to prospects who are ready to talk.

✓

Real-time buying intent, not just enriched cold data

✓

Warm, ready-to-convert B2B leads on autopilot

✓

No Clay-style workflow building or credit-stacking required

✓

Easy setup — no RevOps or technical team needed

✓

Transparent pricing, no surprise credit overages

Try Gojiberry for free →

🔍

Our take

Clay might still be the right fit for your team

Based on your answers, Clay's deep enrichment workflows might cover your current needs. That said, if you ever want warmer, higher-quality leads without endless workflow building, Gojiberry is worth testing as a complement to your setup.

✓

Gojiberry adds real buying intent on top of enrichment

✓

Better lead quality, not just deeper cold databases

✓

Free trial, no credit card required

See how Gojiberry compares →

‍

TL;DR – Quick comparison table

‍

Tool	Best for	Pricing	Data sources	Ease of use
Gojiberry.ai	Warm leads + AI outreach	Free trial	Intent signals + enrichment	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Apollo.io	All-in-one prospecting	Freemium	Large B2B database	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Freckle.io	Simplicity	Paid plans	Enrichment APIs	⭐⭐⭐⭐
ZoomInfo	Enterprise data	Expensive	Massive B2B database	⭐⭐⭐
Persana AI	Signal-based GTM	Paid	Intent + signals	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Exa Websets	Web research	Affordable	Web data	⭐⭐⭐
FullEnrich	Contact enrichment	Usage-based	Multiple APIs	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cognism	EU compliance	Enterprise	GDPR compliant data	⭐⭐⭐
Airscale	Budget GTM teams	Affordable	Multi-source	⭐⭐⭐⭐

‍

The 9 best Clay alternatives for data enrichment (2026)

‍

1. Gojiberry.ai – Best for warm leads + AI-driven outreach

Gojiberry.ai is a modern GTM platform designed for sales teams who want to find high-intent prospects and launch outreach campaigns automatically.

Unlike Clay, which focuses heavily on data workflows, Gojiberry focuses on sales execution.

Key features

-AI agents that identify warm leads
-ICP filtering for targeted prospect lists
-Automated outreach campaigns
-CRM integrations
-Intent signals and lead scoring

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Focus on high-intent leads ✔ Built-in AI outreach automation ✔ Much easier to use than Clay workflows ✔ Integrates with HubSpot, Slack, and Pipedrive
Cons	✖ Not designed for extremely complex data pipelines
Pricing	Free trial available

Gojiberry offers free trials and scalable pricing depending on usage.

👉 Try Gojiberry free:
https://app.gojiberry.ai/registration

Or learn more about the platform:

https://gojiberry.ai/

Best for

-startups
-growth teams
-outbound sales teams
-founders doing GTM

‍

2. Apollo.io – Best all-in-one prospecting platform

Apollo.io is one of the most widely used sales intelligence platforms.

It combines:

lead database
outreach tools
enrichment features

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Huge B2B database ✔ Built-in email outreach ✔ Good free plan
Cons	✖ Data quality varies ✖ Limited enrichment flexibility compared to Clay

Pricing

Free plan available
Paid plans start around $49/month

Best for

Sales teams wanting one platform for prospecting and outreach.

‍

3. Freckle.io – Best for ease of use

Freckle is an emerging platform focused on simple enrichment workflows.

It removes much of the complexity found in Clay.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Easy interface ✔ Quick enrichment workflows ✔ Minimal setup
Cons	✖ Smaller ecosystem ✖ Fewer integrations

‍

Pricing

Paid plans typically start around $100/month

Best for

Startups wanting simple data enrichment tools.

‍

4. ZoomInfo – Best for enterprise data quality

ZoomInfo is one of the most well-known B2B data providers.

Its database includes millions of contacts and companies.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Massive enterprise database ✔ High data accuracy ✔ Intent signals
Cons	✖ Extremely expensive ✖ Long contracts

Pricing

Enterprise pricing
Typically $10k+ per year

Best for

Enterprise sales teams.

‍

5. Persana AI – Best for signal-based GTM

Persana AI focuses on buying signals and GTM automation.

It helps sales teams identify companies showing purchase intent.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Signal-based prospecting ✔ AI insights ✔ Modern UI
Cons	✖ Still early-stage ✖ Smaller dataset

Pricing

Paid plans vary.

Best for

Growth teams prioritizing intent data.

‍

6. Exa Websets – Best for web data research

Exa Websets specializes in web scraping and research workflows.

Instead of traditional B2B databases, it extracts information directly from the web.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Web-based discovery ✔ Flexible data sourcing
Cons	✖ Requires technical understanding ✖ Less plug-and-play

Pricing

Affordable usage-based pricing.

‍

7. FullEnrich – Best for contact enrichment only

FullEnrich focuses specifically on waterfall contact enrichment.

It aggregates multiple providers to maximize email discovery.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ High email coverage ✔ Waterfall enrichment
Cons	✖ No outreach tools ✖ Limited GTM automation

Pricing

Usage-based pricing.

‍

8. Cognism – Best for European data

Cognism is popular among companies targeting European markets.

The platform emphasizes GDPR-compliant data sources.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Strong European database ✔ Compliance focused
Cons	✖ Expensive ✖ Limited automation

Pricing

Enterprise plans.

‍

9. Airscale – Best value Clay alternative

Airscale offers a budget-friendly GTM stack combining enrichment and outreach.

Category	Details
Pros	✔ Affordable pricing ✔ Simple setup ✔ Useful automation
Cons	✖ Smaller ecosystem

Pricing

Paid plans around $50-$150/month

‍

Clay vs Gojiberry: Head-to-head comparison

Feature	Clay	Gojiberry
Data enrichment	✔	✔
GTM workflows	✔	✔
AI outreach	✖	✔
Warm lead detection	✖	✔
Ease of use	Medium	High
Integrations	Many	HubSpot, Slack, Pipedrive
Setup complexity	High	Low

‍

Key difference

Clay focuses on data workflows and enrichment pipelines.

Gojiberry focuses on finding warm leads and automating outreach campaigns.

For many sales teams, that distinction makes Gojiberry the more practical GTM platform.

👉 Start your free trial:
https://app.gojiberry.ai/registration

In 2026, outbound is shifting toward smarter targeting — this Lemlist vs Clay comparison shows how both tools fit into that evolution.

FAQ

What is the best Clay alternative for data enrichment?

Several platforms compete with Clay, including Gojiberry, Apollo, and FullEnrich.

However, the best tool depends on your use case:

-data pipelines → Clay
-outreach automation → Gojiberry
-B2B databases → Apollo

‍

Is Gojiberry cheaper than Clay?

In most cases yes.

Clay pricing scales based on enrichment usage and APIs, while Gojiberry focuses on automation and lead discovery, making pricing easier to predict.

‍